Search for: All records

Abstract There has been a great deal of recent interest in the development of spatial prediction algorithms for very large datasets and/or prediction domains. These methods have primarily been developed in the spatial statistics community, but there has been growing interest in the machine learning community for such methods, primarily driven by the success of deep Gaussian process regression approaches and deep convolutional neural networks. These methods are often computationally expensive to train and implement and consequently, there has been a resurgence of interest in random projections and deep learning models based on random weights—so called reservoir computing methods. Here, we combine several of these ideas to develop the random ensemble deep spatial (REDS) approach to predict spatial data. The procedure uses random Fourier features as inputs to an extreme learning machine (a deep neural model with random weights), and with calibrated ensembles of outputs from this model based on different random weights, it provides a simple uncertainty quantification. The REDS method is demonstrated on simulated data and on a classic large satellite data set. 

Abstract The ever increasing popularity of machine learning methods in virtually all areas of science, engineering and beyond is poised to put established statistical modeling approaches into question. Environmental statistics is no exception, as popular constructs such as neural networks and decision trees are now routinely used to provide forecasts of physical processes ranging from air pollution to meteorology. This presents both challenges and opportunities to the statistical community, which could contribute to the machine learning literature with a model‐based approach with formal uncertainty quantification. Should, however, classical statistical methodologies be discarded altogether in environmental statistics, and should our contribution be focused on formalizing machine learning constructs? This work aims at providing some answers to this thought‐provoking question with two time series case studies where selected models from both the statistical and machine learning literature are compared in terms of forecasting skills, uncertainty quantification and computational time. Relative merits of both class of approaches are discussed, and broad open questions are formulated as a baseline for a discussion on the topic.